Tag Archives: retail

Sustainable Style – Choose Eco-Friendly Fashion

^ special thanks to writer Eve for her take on how to be ‘fashainable’ in this guest post:

Anyone with an ear to the fashion grapevine will know that sustainability is totally on-trend right now. Medical advancements mean that infant mortality rates have dropped hugely and we are now living longer than ever before – with the result that our clothing consumption has hit an all-time high. This means higher production rates, an increase in the number of designers wanting to break into this tough industry and, above all, a need for more and more materials.

Sustainable fashion, also known as eco fashion, has begun to infiltrate local chain stores as well as the catwalks, with designers from the top down using fair trade workers and non-toxic dyes in order to make a sustainable statement.

Understanding Eco Fashion

Many people assume that eco fashion is all about recycled fabrics and clothes made from leaves, but this is not true at all. There are a number of different ways you can make a difference to the way you shop without changing your style at all – in fact, you could already be eco-shopping without knowing it!

For example, if you choose faux fur over the genuine article or avoid leather like the plague, you are already following a vegan fashion pattern. Vegans will not wear (or eat) any animal by-product, therefore keeping fur and leather well away from their wardrobes. Or maybe you prefer your fashion one of a kind and therefore buy handmade items? In doing this, you are helping to cut down on waste which is created by mass manufacturing, whilst also ensuring you are buying a quality product which is created to last for years. This cuts down the need to constantly replace worn or damaged clothing, and thus saves the planet. Easy, huh?

There are plenty of resources out there which provide information on sustainable fashion, and once you understand how many ways there are to adopt a sustainable wardrobe, making the switch is a piece of cake.

How You Can Help

So you’ve already decided to cross-check every label for toxic dyes and sworn off anything which isn’t made from organic materials – excellent! You’ve taken a huge step forward and are definitely doing your bit for sustainable shopping. Yet the part many people forget is what to do with the clothes once you’ve finished with them. Shockingly many people forget that clothing and textiles are just as recyclable as plastics, cardboard and glass, and as a result tons of unwanted clothes end up on landfill sites every year. However, it is estimated that up to 95 per cent of these items could be re-worn, re-used or recycled. In that case – why not get creative?

Donating an unwanted sweater to charity or shredding up and old shirt to use as a cleaning cloth is a good place to start, but hardly the most inventive use of the materials at hand. An old pair of jeans with a hole in the knee could be turned into a cute pair of Daisy Dukes or a new purse, while the unused bottom half could be cut up, dyed or redesigned and turned into patches to customise other items. Sometimes, of course, things are too damaged to be saved or re-used, but this is where the true meaning of recycling comes in. Textile fibres or insulating materials can be created from these garments in an ideal example of preventing waste.

Smart Stores

Fortunately, fashion chain stores are now beginning to realise the impact our massive demand for new clothes is having on our planet. Last year, Zara announced its commitment to going toxic-free by reducing the number of hazardous chemicals used in its garment production, while H&M has recently launched an ethical fashion range called Conscious. As well as cutting down on the amount of water used in denim production and committing to using only organic cotton, the retailer is also rewarding customers for dropping off bags of recyclable clothing by giving them money off vouchers for each bag donated. It is very clear that the fashion world is embracing sustainability in a way few other industries are – while clothing manufacturers are making an attempt to use non-toxic dyes in clearing our waterways, the pharmaceutical industry continues to dump harmful materials in the system, for example.

As consumers, we dictate the trends, the styles and the way things are produced; or to put it more simply, if we don’t buy it they won’t make it. By raising awareness of the need for sustainability in all industries, we truly can change the world.

Celebrate Earth Day, Everyday! The Today Show Goes Green with Modavanti.com

today

What’s the “new crop of eco-friendly clothes?” NBC News’ the Today Show says it’s “eco-chic” and doesn’t look quite like it used to anymore thanks to retailers like Modavanti.

Chassie Post from Gilt Groupe joined Today Show host Natalie Morales this morning to show us that yes, eco-fashion can be stylish. A family-friendly floral print from H&M’s Conscious Collection flounced down the outdoor runway—on a pair of women’s pants and on a dress for young girls made out of recycled polyester and organic cotton—setting the scene for what it means to be green.

Another eco-fabric showcased was Tencel, as seen on a model in a maxi dress by ecoSkin. Weary of water usage? The vest in that ensemble is from Levi’s Water<Less denim line which uses 90% less water in production. A vegan leather peplum top from Tinley Road followed and was paired with Edun jeans.

Edun will be on our site soon and joins our recently-added brand, Olsenhaus, which was featured in the next look of the Today Goes Green segment: the brand’s purely vegan sandals and a chambray shirt (by Kut from the Kloth) complimented our fairly-traded Peplum Skirt in Yellow by Afia. Help support a women’s cooperative in Ghana just by shopping the stylish skirt at Modavanti.com. Fahertybrand.com wrapped up the show with an eco-swimsuit and beach wrap.

The models looked great and you can, too, since Modavanti is moving #fashion #forward. The two fashion-forward hosts highlighted our philosophy—that eco-conscious means many things—so many, that we empower the consumer to design their own style philosophy and encourage users to shop what’s important to them. Wear our set of Sustainability Badges with pride as you decide for yourself what it means to be green.

Eco-fashion has evolved. Will you? #Jointhefuture

One size fits all.

Can’t find your size? I’m not surprised.

Maybe the tag reads a certain number, but why do I feel so uncertain? An 8 in one store is a 4 in another. Some jeans fit like a glove while others in the same size hang loosely.

I hope that I’m not coming off as though I’m complaining, but isn’t it ironic that we have a retail industry producing clothes into which we’re trying to fit? Instead of us trying to fit their models, shouldn’t businesses change their models and make clothing that fits us?

"Whose Size 8 Are You Wearing?

Pinterest

In today’s ‘globalized’ world, as clichéd as that term might be, retail brands’ customers’ sizes aren’t just a culmination of national demographics. Now, there are more multinational identities—and shapes and sizes—which need to be accounted for when going forward in determining product guides and size charts.

Pinterest

Pinterest

The current model is unsustainable since we don’t fit one certain mold. Retailers need to follow suit and provide us with better-fitting sizing options. Luckily, the innovative intersection of fashion and technology means we as consumers don’t have to wait around for big-box retailers to change their look.

These fashion-tech firms are a good fit for those who want to self-sustain:

Why should we be the ones struggling to find our size when corporations have the budget to customize their assortments? Or, better yet, why not adopt a virtual mannequin? Whereby an online user has the ability to input their measurements and upload a digital dress form upon which items in one’s shopping cart can be tried.

  • And, cue Fits.Me—a virtual fitting room of replicating robots—finally, clothes that fit me to a “T” instead of me trying to fit into a letter!
Pinterest

Pinterest via Fits.me.com

Too often it seems that garment racks are littered with over-projections or misfires from the season’s “hottest” and “coolest.” Instead of gauging tempered trends, retailers could measure consumer taste by examining what we actually need, not what we presumably need as dictated by the latest issue of a fashion magazine.

  • Oh, hello JustFab—a fast-fashion delivery, yes, but this well-backed firm has a “subscription model” which makes the business “much more predictable.”
Pinterest via JUSTFAB.com

Pinterest

I’ll try it on.

After all, isn’t it about time big-box retailers and fast-fashion chains service our needs? Forget about what we want—we 21st century Conscious consumers can not afford such a luxurious choice—it’s not a matter of dollars and cents, but a matter of common sense. Even the high fashion world has taken note of this shift in style with guerrilla shows and blog rolls.

  • Of course, there’s Garmz—another game-changer that turned heads by making fashion a thing of the future.
Pinterest

Pinterest

Isn’t it about time big box retailers calculate their turn-over rates based on bettering society? Commonly-sensed by merchandising professionals is a need to replenish and re-stock, but as based on mathematical algorithms generated by a computer running past sales data. While advancements in technology have allowed Buyers and Planners to calibrate exact formulas and analyze past trends with software tools, it’s about time we use social tools to advance from mass production as we forecast for a future of less consumption.

  • Ah, yes LookMazing—this site is well, uh-mazing—it’s transforming street style into social style by taking the offline revolution online and back again with uploaded user photos.
Pinterest

Pinterest via LookMazing.com

What are social tools anyway?

Resources like Pinterest, Twitter, Polyvore, Tumblr, Wanelo, and of course, Facebook are some examples. Resources like customers’ sizes, consumers’ tastes, and workers’ voices are more examples of social tools since they do make-up our society. Regardless of your personal stance on the whole climate change issue, if we don’t change our personal consumption patterns, the fashion climate is sure to be disastrous. By tapping into these resources, retailers could waste fewer natural resources like oil, cotton, textiles, and people’s spirit. Companies could analyze social metrics and provide us with less options and more taste.

Isn’t it about time retailers dressed us instead of us addressing them? 

All’s I’m sayin’ is, this ill-fitting industry needs a make-over.

Lower quantities.

Higher quality.

And of course, it starts with us; I can always take up this issue myself by going to a local tailor; this way, I can give back to the community by enlisting their fitting expertise.

That’s a good fit for us all.

 

Don’t judge a garment by its label.

Or is it don’t judge a book by its cover? Childhood phrases and parental teachings aside, there is general encouragement to not judge others or the unknown based solely on outward appearances. As human beings, favoritism exists for the ism “don’t judge a book by its cover.” But as consumers, do the same rules apply?

All labels aside, it is of course up to us to educate ourselves as buying customers and to get involved as is the case with all issues of civic engagement. However, isn’t it up to “them,” or companies, providing us with a product or service to provide awareness, especially since we are after all, all potentially buying customers?

I don’t like to say “us” versus “them” as though we are in a dueling match, for it is a dual obligation when it comes time to be our own judge. Companies, though, are required to label products and advertise services in accordance to signed laws and corporate activities are monitored by assigned authorities; these rules and regulations have been established so as to protect the consumer while also providing a fair playing field for all parties involved, including competing small businesses, SMEs, and corporations.

Our needs are changing and new rules and regulations must naturally evolve. We see this need to evolve in the Big Food revolution with past legislative failures in states like Oregon and most recently with Proposition 37 in California as well as opposition to the Just Label It movement. ”You are what you eat” is often practiced by medical professionals, mindful mothers, and even our own conscience coach when making personal food choices.

If we are what we eat, then shouldn’t we care about what we wear? Many of us do! As seen in the variety of outlets and in the diversity of support for conscious consumption when it comes to one’s purchases, fashion and apparel is an expression in demand. Whether one is cutting down on the industry’s intake, incorporating more mindfulness when making purchases, or choosing to buy environmentally and socially sustainable fashions from retailers and organizations with a mission and values closely related to one’s own individual beliefs, there is a need for an upgrade in rules and regulations when it comes to labeling our clothes.

Of course, as clothing consumers, we can research a retailer’s practices and uncover more about a brand. We can of course read the item’s label, but is “Made in Bangladesh” or “Manufactured in China” enough? Some prefer to buy local or only shop certified Fair Trade items. Some might not even read the label’s contents. Similar to a content person in a label-less relationship, some might not even need a label at all. What do you look for in a label? Share your shopping criteria @fashainable with the hash-tag #mindfull.

And beyond the mindset of the consumer, what about the other side? Turn the label over and you might find that big box retailers and their suppliers may voice the same argument as those in the business of Big Food: any additional labeling would be too cumbersome resulting in excessive regulation and ultimately, higher end prices for the consumer.

Refreshingly, some brands have taken it upon themselves to make note of the ingredients used, processes infused, or related #brandaid news as seen in the faces of “The People Behind the Product” by One Mango Tree. It’s inspiring initiatives like these and like this image of an imaginative label shared by Dress Up Cycle highlighting a probable product’s positive points that can help point us in the right direction. Don’t like what you see? No sweat. Send your labels back or sign a petition and get dressed.

Informative labeling of existing practices—which claim to be safe and workers conditions which claim to be humane—is less of an issue of red tape and higher costs along the supply chain and more of an issue regarding lifelong lessons taught at an early age in that one shouldn’t judge what one does not know. If we don’t know exactly what it is that we as consumers are buying, than how are we to judge?

Cereal boxes have managed to evolve over time as 3-D crossword puzzles and our shampoo bottles and conditioning counterparts are now accompanied by trivia Q&As. Surely the commerce community with business models built on principles of efficiency and effectiveness can manage to invest the necessary resources into a more exemplary labeling system without placing the burden on the paying customer.

But, who am I to judge?

Reproach the Gap for its approach in Bangladesh.

Gaining heat from last year’s craze, patterns are hotter than ever this year, from brightly-angled garments to romantic floral fashions, but one apparel pattern is literally scorching: a blaze of fires are popping up in ready-made garment (RMG) factories across the world’s fastest-growing mega-city, Dhaka. While watching the local news last week, I listened to a segment on an urban slum fire in the Hazaribagh area that left at least 11 people dead. Those killed were all children and women, some working as garment factory workers; this particular fire’s cause was unknown, but it quickly spread among the shantytown. Fatal flames continue to spread to the slum dwellers’ workplaces at factories like That’s It Sportswear with even higher death tolls, some dying from the fire itself and others jumping from upper floors of the building. News reports fired across the TV screen this weekend covering another garment factory fire on the outskirts of Dhaka at the Tazreen Fashions factory where over 100 people died.

Many factors are considered as reasons why such factory fires start, but reasons for why peoples’ lives end include locked doors and blocked exits. Attention to such negligence is stoked by news stations and tended by workers’ rights groups like the Global Union for Garment Workers, the Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC), the International Labor Rights Forum (ILRF), the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC), and the Maquila Solidarity Network (MSN).Together, they form a coalition with a sure-fire way—or at least a more precautionary way—to contain RMG factory-fires’ frequency.

This season’s inferno of patterns that lit up the runways could not be contained, as the popular aesthetic sprinkled down like ashes onto the high street and burned like embers into retailers’ assortments. One such retailer, the Gap, may be on-trend with its take on patterns and prints, but the brand should be scolded for its refusal to sign onto the coalition’s historic fire safety program. Instead of joining the brigade of brands like PVH Corp. and Tchibo, the Gap’s take is to self-regulate. Presently, the Gap has the right to reject the fire safety program and create its own, but we as consumers have the right to reject the Gap for its lack of transparency. A colleague of mine from India; he heads-up Design and is familiar with garment production; reminded me that retailers shouldn’t bear all of the blame for the RMG sectors’ faults, like lax worker safety conditions; I agree. Similar to how groups like the Global Union, CCC, ILRF, WRC, and MSN have joined forces to set a hose to the host of incendiary issues, governments, factory owners, and retailers should equally own their shares in order to solve the industry’s problems.

With the aforementioned squad of acronyms’ monumental collaboration with stakeholders, the many players are doing their part; now GAP has to fill the gap and do theirs. In 2010, the retailer went from Blue to Green with its eco-friendly recycled denim initiative to help communities in need. Almost engulfed by financial woes in 2011, the Gap recently came out of its own smoke with corporate decisions regarding product development and retail operations. Part of its 2012 strategy was a new focus on Asia with store openings in China and shipping services to countries like Bangladesh. Why not go green with a people-friendly 2013 and help the South Asian community in need with better working conditions? As someone who is trying to shop with a conscience, this former Long-and-Lean-jean-customer will have to find her denim-fit-of-choice elsewhere; this will be my own “self-approach” until GAP douses its self-regulatory approach to worker safety.

Join me in a Boot-cut-boycott, ask your local Gap store to start recycling denim again, or sign the Change.org petition telling the Gap to join the worker safety program.

Feel the need to read more?

  • Gap pulls out of Bangladesh fire safety program (MSN)
  • Fatal Fire in Bangladesh Highlights the Dangers Facing Garment Workers (NYT)
  • Bangladesh slum fire kills 11 (CNN)
  • Make a difference (GAP)