Tag Archives: rights

Celebrate Earth Day, Everyday! The Today Show Goes Green with Modavanti.com

today

What’s the “new crop of eco-friendly clothes?” NBC News’ the Today Show says it’s “eco-chic” and doesn’t look quite like it used to anymore thanks to retailers like Modavanti.

Chassie Post from Gilt Groupe joined Today Show host Natalie Morales this morning to show us that yes, eco-fashion can be stylish. A family-friendly floral print from H&M’s Conscious Collection flounced down the outdoor runway—on a pair of women’s pants and on a dress for young girls made out of recycled polyester and organic cotton—setting the scene for what it means to be green.

Another eco-fabric showcased was Tencel, as seen on a model in a maxi dress by ecoSkin. Weary of water usage? The vest in that ensemble is from Levi’s Water<Less denim line which uses 90% less water in production. A vegan leather peplum top from Tinley Road followed and was paired with Edun jeans.

Edun will be on our site soon and joins our recently-added brand, Olsenhaus, which was featured in the next look of the Today Goes Green segment: the brand’s purely vegan sandals and a chambray shirt (by Kut from the Kloth) complimented our fairly-traded Peplum Skirt in Yellow by Afia. Help support a women’s cooperative in Ghana just by shopping the stylish skirt at Modavanti.com. Fahertybrand.com wrapped up the show with an eco-swimsuit and beach wrap.

The models looked great and you can, too, since Modavanti is moving #fashion #forward. The two fashion-forward hosts highlighted our philosophy—that eco-conscious means many things—so many, that we empower the consumer to design their own style philosophy and encourage users to shop what’s important to them. Wear our set of Sustainability Badges with pride as you decide for yourself what it means to be green.

Eco-fashion has evolved. Will you? #Jointhefuture

Don’t judge a garment by its label.

Or is it don’t judge a book by its cover? Childhood phrases and parental teachings aside, there is general encouragement to not judge others or the unknown based solely on outward appearances. As human beings, favoritism exists for the ism “don’t judge a book by its cover.” But as consumers, do the same rules apply?

All labels aside, it is of course up to us to educate ourselves as buying customers and to get involved as is the case with all issues of civic engagement. However, isn’t it up to “them,” or companies, providing us with a product or service to provide awareness, especially since we are after all, all potentially buying customers?

I don’t like to say “us” versus “them” as though we are in a dueling match, for it is a dual obligation when it comes time to be our own judge. Companies, though, are required to label products and advertise services in accordance to signed laws and corporate activities are monitored by assigned authorities; these rules and regulations have been established so as to protect the consumer while also providing a fair playing field for all parties involved, including competing small businesses, SMEs, and corporations.

Our needs are changing and new rules and regulations must naturally evolve. We see this need to evolve in the Big Food revolution with past legislative failures in states like Oregon and most recently with Proposition 37 in California as well as opposition to the Just Label It movement. ”You are what you eat” is often practiced by medical professionals, mindful mothers, and even our own conscience coach when making personal food choices.

If we are what we eat, then shouldn’t we care about what we wear? Many of us do! As seen in the variety of outlets and in the diversity of support for conscious consumption when it comes to one’s purchases, fashion and apparel is an expression in demand. Whether one is cutting down on the industry’s intake, incorporating more mindfulness when making purchases, or choosing to buy environmentally and socially sustainable fashions from retailers and organizations with a mission and values closely related to one’s own individual beliefs, there is a need for an upgrade in rules and regulations when it comes to labeling our clothes.

Of course, as clothing consumers, we can research a retailer’s practices and uncover more about a brand. We can of course read the item’s label, but is “Made in Bangladesh” or “Manufactured in China” enough? Some prefer to buy local or only shop certified Fair Trade items. Some might not even read the label’s contents. Similar to a content person in a label-less relationship, some might not even need a label at all. What do you look for in a label? Share your shopping criteria @fashainable with the hash-tag #mindfull.

And beyond the mindset of the consumer, what about the other side? Turn the label over and you might find that big box retailers and their suppliers may voice the same argument as those in the business of Big Food: any additional labeling would be too cumbersome resulting in excessive regulation and ultimately, higher end prices for the consumer.

Refreshingly, some brands have taken it upon themselves to make note of the ingredients used, processes infused, or related #brandaid news as seen in the faces of “The People Behind the Product” by One Mango Tree. It’s inspiring initiatives like these and like this image of an imaginative label shared by Dress Up Cycle highlighting a probable product’s positive points that can help point us in the right direction. Don’t like what you see? No sweat. Send your labels back or sign a petition and get dressed.

Informative labeling of existing practices—which claim to be safe and workers conditions which claim to be humane—is less of an issue of red tape and higher costs along the supply chain and more of an issue regarding lifelong lessons taught at an early age in that one shouldn’t judge what one does not know. If we don’t know exactly what it is that we as consumers are buying, than how are we to judge?

Cereal boxes have managed to evolve over time as 3-D crossword puzzles and our shampoo bottles and conditioning counterparts are now accompanied by trivia Q&As. Surely the commerce community with business models built on principles of efficiency and effectiveness can manage to invest the necessary resources into a more exemplary labeling system without placing the burden on the paying customer.

But, who am I to judge?

Reproach the Gap for its approach in Bangladesh.

Gaining heat from last year’s craze, patterns are hotter than ever this year, from brightly-angled garments to romantic floral fashions, but one apparel pattern is literally scorching: a blaze of fires are popping up in ready-made garment (RMG) factories across the world’s fastest-growing mega-city, Dhaka. While watching the local news last week, I listened to a segment on an urban slum fire in the Hazaribagh area that left at least 11 people dead. Those killed were all children and women, some working as garment factory workers; this particular fire’s cause was unknown, but it quickly spread among the shantytown. Fatal flames continue to spread to the slum dwellers’ workplaces at factories like That’s It Sportswear with even higher death tolls, some dying from the fire itself and others jumping from upper floors of the building. News reports fired across the TV screen this weekend covering another garment factory fire on the outskirts of Dhaka at the Tazreen Fashions factory where over 100 people died.

Many factors are considered as reasons why such factory fires start, but reasons for why peoples’ lives end include locked doors and blocked exits. Attention to such negligence is stoked by news stations and tended by workers’ rights groups like the Global Union for Garment Workers, the Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC), the International Labor Rights Forum (ILRF), the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC), and the Maquila Solidarity Network (MSN).Together, they form a coalition with a sure-fire way—or at least a more precautionary way—to contain RMG factory-fires’ frequency.

This season’s inferno of patterns that lit up the runways could not be contained, as the popular aesthetic sprinkled down like ashes onto the high street and burned like embers into retailers’ assortments. One such retailer, the Gap, may be on-trend with its take on patterns and prints, but the brand should be scolded for its refusal to sign onto the coalition’s historic fire safety program. Instead of joining the brigade of brands like PVH Corp. and Tchibo, the Gap’s take is to self-regulate. Presently, the Gap has the right to reject the fire safety program and create its own, but we as consumers have the right to reject the Gap for its lack of transparency. A colleague of mine from India; he heads-up Design and is familiar with garment production; reminded me that retailers shouldn’t bear all of the blame for the RMG sectors’ faults, like lax worker safety conditions; I agree. Similar to how groups like the Global Union, CCC, ILRF, WRC, and MSN have joined forces to set a hose to the host of incendiary issues, governments, factory owners, and retailers should equally own their shares in order to solve the industry’s problems.

With the aforementioned squad of acronyms’ monumental collaboration with stakeholders, the many players are doing their part; now GAP has to fill the gap and do theirs. In 2010, the retailer went from Blue to Green with its eco-friendly recycled denim initiative to help communities in need. Almost engulfed by financial woes in 2011, the Gap recently came out of its own smoke with corporate decisions regarding product development and retail operations. Part of its 2012 strategy was a new focus on Asia with store openings in China and shipping services to countries like Bangladesh. Why not go green with a people-friendly 2013 and help the South Asian community in need with better working conditions? As someone who is trying to shop with a conscience, this former Long-and-Lean-jean-customer will have to find her denim-fit-of-choice elsewhere; this will be my own “self-approach” until GAP douses its self-regulatory approach to worker safety.

Join me in a Boot-cut-boycott, ask your local Gap store to start recycling denim again, or sign the Change.org petition telling the Gap to join the worker safety program.

Feel the need to read more?

  • Gap pulls out of Bangladesh fire safety program (MSN)
  • Fatal Fire in Bangladesh Highlights the Dangers Facing Garment Workers (NYT)
  • Bangladesh slum fire kills 11 (CNN)
  • Make a difference (GAP)